So... embarking on my first JV...
But the person who was planning on being the "money person" is getting advice from a lot of people (financial people). We have moved from my original presentation: "Your money, my expertise." Would put my name on the mortgage, title, I would deal with lawyers, insurance, property management, etc. She would input the money, protected by the JV agreement, for a 50/50 split.
Financial advisors to her: "Make sure your name is on the mortgage and title."
Okay, we can work with that. Heck, it`s the same money for me with less work.
More dialogue.
Financial advisors to her: "Set up the bank account in your name, and you control the cash flow to this guy."
Hmm... somehow I think we are moving further and further away from the original intent of this thing. She`s getting all the work that I was trying to remove from her. I`m still getting the cash flow. So in the end it could be a better deal for me. Same return without all the work! But the work is exactly what I was seeking to remove from her plate for her sake (she is a gun-shy former landlord who believes in the value of investing in real estate, but does not want the headaches that go with being a landlord).
I would still be liaising with property management and making decisions about the property regarding m&r and refinancing and selling eventually. But almost everything else would be hers to manage - insurance, lawyers, banks, bank account.
So, what do I do? She is still open to a 50/50 split! Her money. Her mortgage. Her insurance. Her bank. Me 50% profits.
Is she crazy? Or am I for thinking it`s unfair to take 50% return for a lot less work?
But the person who was planning on being the "money person" is getting advice from a lot of people (financial people). We have moved from my original presentation: "Your money, my expertise." Would put my name on the mortgage, title, I would deal with lawyers, insurance, property management, etc. She would input the money, protected by the JV agreement, for a 50/50 split.
Financial advisors to her: "Make sure your name is on the mortgage and title."
Okay, we can work with that. Heck, it`s the same money for me with less work.
More dialogue.
Financial advisors to her: "Set up the bank account in your name, and you control the cash flow to this guy."
Hmm... somehow I think we are moving further and further away from the original intent of this thing. She`s getting all the work that I was trying to remove from her. I`m still getting the cash flow. So in the end it could be a better deal for me. Same return without all the work! But the work is exactly what I was seeking to remove from her plate for her sake (she is a gun-shy former landlord who believes in the value of investing in real estate, but does not want the headaches that go with being a landlord).
I would still be liaising with property management and making decisions about the property regarding m&r and refinancing and selling eventually. But almost everything else would be hers to manage - insurance, lawyers, banks, bank account.
So, what do I do? She is still open to a 50/50 split! Her money. Her mortgage. Her insurance. Her bank. Me 50% profits.
Is she crazy? Or am I for thinking it`s unfair to take 50% return for a lot less work?