Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

Top Risks of Real Estate Investing

RealtyHub

0
Registered
Joined
Sep 17, 2012
Messages
7
The most successful investors, in any sector, are those that refrain from wearing rose coloured glasses. Instead they ask the hard questions and look for the weakness in their prospective investment as this approach allows them to be objective and make fully informed decisions.







Although the real estate market can be a tremendous investment vehicle providing regular cash flow and wealth creation, it has also been responsible for wiping out entire fortunes and forcing many into bankruptcy as evidenced in the late 80's.







The multi-unit residential market is one real estate segment that has done extremely well over the past decade throughout Canada. This is especially true in the larger urban centres such as Toronto, Vancouver, Calgary and Edmonton where market cap compression has resulted in cap rates as low at 4% . This recent success however means that investors need to be even more cautious and pay closer attention to the fundamentals and risks associated with this segment before investing.







The three main risks that need to assessed include (1) Economic Risk, (2) Political Risk and (3) Property Specific Risk. As previously mentioned, every investment carries risk. As an investor, you need to assess and try to mitigate those risks. A such, the goal of this article will be to review each of the aforementioned risks and offer strategies to help mitigate them where possible.







ECONOMIC RISK



Generally speaking, Canadians are in an extremely enviable position economically. Our real estate market has not only survived, but thrived, while other markets have collapsed around us. Even though foreign dollars are investing in Canadian real estate as a safe haven, investing can still be a risky proposition.







Interest Rates - What goes up must come down (and vice versa)



I intentionally began with the interest rate risk as it is the number one perceived risk by prospective investors. As Canadians, we have witnessed interest rates at historic lows for a prolonged period of time. As recently as Dec 4th Mark Carney and the Bank of Canada, for the 18th consecutive time, kept the benchmark interest rate at 1%. While these historically low interest rates present great opportunity, at the same time they present a great perceived risk. The thinking goes like this; If rates rise too quickly, a once positive cash-flow property will turn into a negative cash-flow property.







Mitigate:
There are two potential ways to help mitigate interest rate volatility. The first is to simply take the volatility out of the picture by locking into long term financing anywhere between a 5 to 10 year term. This will provide investors with a prolonged period of predictable cash flow and mortgage pay down. A second option would be to buy CMHC insurance on the property. CMHC insurance typically means discounts as high as 1% off interest rates for the life of the mortgage. Combine these two strategies and you can get 10 year financing as cheap as 3-4%. It doesn't get much safer or more predictable than that.







Vacancy Rate Risk




Landlords have been enjoying historically low vacancy rates across Canada. According to a CMHC report issued on June 12th; "The average rental apartment vacancy rate in Canada's 35 major centres decreased slightly to 2.3 per cent in April 2012, from 2.5 per cent in April 2011". Once again, the same type of perceived risk applies here as it did to the interest rate section above. Investors are concerned that vacancy rates have nowhere to go but up which can significantly impact a property's cash flow.







Mitigate: The best way for investors to mitigate this potential risk is to buy in areas where key economic metrics point towards low future vacancy rates. These metrics include, but are not limited to; low unemployment, population growth, GDP growth, large scale construction/development, inmigration and currently low vacancy rates. Investing in economically sound areas will help to mitigate vacancy rate risk in times of economic downturn.







POLITICAL RISK



Canadians are very fortunate to live in a country that has very little political risk. Apart from some left and right leaning skirmishes, our real estate sector and property rights are very stable and secure.







Rent Control Risk



Rent control risk varies from Province to Province. For example, British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario and PEI have rent control legislation allowing landlords to only raise rents according to their respective Provincial guidelines. Until recently, Ontario landlords were allowed to raise rents based on the Ontario Consumer Price Index (CPI). However, for 2013, the maximum increase has been capped at 2.5%. It wasn't so long ago that Ontario landlords were limited with the amount they could raise rents even when the units were vacant. The main point here is that rent control legislation is an active risk that can appear at any time.







Mitigate - Knowledge is the key here. Ensure that you are familiar with your Province's current and historical legislation on rent control, if any. Right wing governments tend to avoid rent control legislation whereas left wing governments tend to embrace it. Also get familiar with any grassroots political movements focused on introducing new rent control legislation or placing new caps on rent control.







Licensing Risk




Licensing risk varies from city to city. It has been a hotly contested issue in a number of Ontario cities including Waterloo, Toronto and Hamilton. In Waterloo, a rental housing licensing bylaw was recently enacted imposing new fees on landlords. In Hamilton, landlords are hotly contesting a draft bylaw to regulate buildings with between one and six rental units. Licensing at the end of the day ultimately leads to new expenses for the landlord affecting cash flow. It also makes investors less likely to invest in cities that are heavily regulated thus affecting real estate prices in those cities.







Mitigate
- Once again, knowledge is the key. Become familiar with the political landscape in any city your are considering for your investment dollars. All other things being equal, look to invest where legislation favors the landlord.







PROPERTY SPECIFIC RISK




Property Selection Risk




Property selection can be a very risky endeavour. In fact, this can be the riskiest stage for investors as a poorly selected investment property can lead to perpetual negative cash flow and eventually force a sale. A "Negative Cash-Flow Investment" is one oxy-moron real estate investors should aim to avoid (yes, there are situations where a negative-cash flow investment property can be turned around, but I wouldn't recommend it for the novice). Risks in property selection include, but are not limited to; insufficient cash flow, imminent capital expenditures, rental rates above market, legally non-conforming property, poor tenant profile, environmental issues, structural issues and understated expenses. Buying an investment property without being fully apprised of what makes a good investment property may be the biggest risk of all.







Mitigate - Knowledge once again is the key. Become educated on what makes a great investment property. Read books, join real estate groups/networks, surf the web, find a mentor. Successful investors know from the outset if their investment will be successful because they have crunched the numbers and accounted for any potential risks.







Vacancy Risk



Although already addressed under Economic Risks, Vacancy Risk can also be property specific. High vacancies can adversely affect a property' cash flow and in turn, affect the value. In some cases, high vacancy rates are not a function of the economy, but are specific property. A poor tenant profile will lead to weak cash flow and higher expenses.







Mitigate - The 2 best ways to ensure that a property is either at or below the areas average vacancy rate is to (1) ensure the property is properly maintained and (2) ensure that all new tenants are screened properly which includes running a credit check, verifying employment, checking past references and verifying ID. Both of these initiatives will help to lower tenant turnover.







Unknown/Unexpected Expenses Risk




The unknown and unexpected are always a scary prospect for real estate investors. Given that properties usually run on tight budgets, an unexpected cost can quickly make a cash flow positive property cash flow negative.







Mitigate
- When first buying an investment property, always have a professional inspector give it the once over to ensure that there are no serious issues. It also provides the investor with recourse if the inspector missed something major. With respect to unexpected expenses ... welcome to real estate investing. Unfortunately, it happens all the time, but as long as you are prepared for it, it won't be a big shock. Set aside a contingency fund that you contribute to every month from the property' cash flow to address potential surprises such as a leaky roof or new boiler.







While not an exhaustive list of the potential risks associated with real estate investing, this article has outlined some of the major considerations to be investigated before purchasing any investment property.







Author: Paul Kondakos, BA, LL.B, MBA - Professional Real Estate Investor - RealtyHub.ca
 

Thomas Beyer

0
REIN Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2007
Messages
13,881
Good points .. here are a few more:



Risk 1: too high a mortgage.

Mitigate: do not overlever !



Risk 2: not enough cash for upgrades/negative cash-flow/vacancies

Mitigate: more cash down and/or more cash reserves



Cash is King - Cash-Flow is Queen ! (TM)



Risk 3: area with ex-migration or weak economics leading to property value decline

Mitigate: research, or access to research (such as provided by REIN) to not invest in cities or parts of cities with declining economics and ex-migration
 

chrisnorris1

0
Registered
Joined
Dec 3, 2012
Messages
6
You have pointed out some pretty holes in the system. But still a little risk has to be taken if you want to succeed in the investment. Try to invest that much, what you can afford if a little loss will happen.
 

Thomas Beyer

0
REIN Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2007
Messages
13,881
[quote user=chrisnorris1] if a little loss will happen.
If indeed little .. some folks lost their entire equity (and then some) when investing in 2007 with 5% or 10% down ... due to falling rents and higher vacancies, for example in Grand Prairie .. however if they were able to hold 5 years to now they all came out OK and likely made money due to continued mortgage paydown even in a flat market with no cash flow.



Thus, ability to HOLD is the key to success; thus have enough cash as a reserve and enough cash-flow to cover all expenses including 4 months vacancy and modest property upgrades, such as new carpet throughout, new fridge plus new paint throughout after a trashy tenant left (or more likely: was evicted)
 

JBagorio

0
Registered
Joined
Dec 4, 2007
Messages
263
How about ~ Risk of greed and stupidity.





To some that thinks why would they invest with an Expert Partners if they can go out there alone and gain it all, stumbling from one mistake to another, and invest blindly without the proper knowledge and experience. To some that thinks they feel they need to get into the game to keep up with their good old neighbours (The Jones`). To those who would rather pretend and swim around naked, than asking for help. To those who are worried about what others might think of them if they admit to their own faults and weaknesses.









Mitigate:
Make sure you are wearing the proper swimming attire, so that when the floodgate opens you would not be caught swimming commando style.
 

Thomas Beyer

0
REIN Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2007
Messages
13,881
[quote user=Darr]

YOUR GREATEST RISK IS: NOT HAVING YOUR MORTGAGE RENEWED!


I'd say it IS a risk, but not the greatest one.



Banks are HAPPY to lend money, it is their business !



However, they do not like excessive leverage !



Also to keep in mind is that your mortgage is paid down about 10% in 5 years, over 20% in 10 .. and as such the renewal is usually on higher rent/income (and/or higher property value) and therefore even lower loan-to-value on renewal time.



Of course, in a vastly declining market that exists in some ex-migration towns that is a higher risk than in normal cities people actually like to live in.
 

Darr

0
Registered
Joined
Sep 3, 2012
Messages
82
[quote user=ThomasBeyer]

Banks are HAPPY to lend money, it is their business !



Of course, in a vastly declining market that exists in some ex-migration towns...




Please read my post explaining this scenario here : What_is_better_cash-flow or_higher_ROI






The possible scenario I described is one of rapidly accelerating price appreciation of hard assets triggered by a spike in the velocity of money cause by a collapse in confidence of a currency.






In this context, the banks or any sane creditor would pull the plug on any further lending since their return of principal plus accrued interest has less purchasing power in P2 than it had in P1 when the loan was issued. In a hyperinflationary environment, all credit dries up immediately. I can't think of a greater risk.



PS. I know what you meant but allow me to clarify what you wrote : Banks do not like excessive leverage !



Banks LOVE leverage since that's what they sell. That why most western citizens are up to their eyeballs in debt.

You probably meant to say: Banks do not like credit risk or more specifically to lose money.



The big US banks are leveraged 50:1 and it is all about greed!



See here:



http://usawatchdog.com/four-biggest-banks-in-america-have-huge-leverage/





For them, it is all risk free since they will be bailed out again and again by the central banks with taxpayers money.

Nobody will bail you and I, should things go wrong.
 

Thomas Beyer

0
REIN Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2007
Messages
13,881
Hyperinflation is a nice buzz word, and worthy a theoretical discussion, aka Zimbabwe , Argentina or 1920's German Reich. In a theoretical hyper inflation one would need no refinance ! One sells for 10x or 100x. Or best one buys a few pieces of real estate. Sell one, and keep the other all mortgage free ! There is also the possible ( so far undiscussed) risks of a tenant exploding a bomb in your home, a tanker truck driving into your house or a meteorite destroying your home. Lets stay real when discussing theoretical risks, please.
 

Darr

0
Registered
Joined
Sep 3, 2012
Messages
82
[quote user=ThomasBeyer]Hyperinflation is a nice buzz word, and worthy
a theoretical discussion, aka Zimbabwe , Argentina or 1920's German
Reich. In a theoretical hyper inflation one would need no refinance !
One sells for 10x or 100x. Or best one buys a few pieces of real estate.
Sell one, and keep the other all mortgage free ! There is also the
possible ( so far undiscussed) risks of a tenant exploding a bomb in
your home, a tanker truck driving into your house or a meteorite
destroying your home. Lets stay real when discussing theoretical risks,
please.






Thomas, I'm not suggesting a far out-there scenario involving the Four Horsemen`s of the apocalypse.







Hyperinflation is not a buzz word nor is it theoretical. However, you may replace it with either `loss of faith in the currency` or `Cost Push Inflation` if that`s more palatable for you. Notwithstanding, the supporting evidence is compelling had you taken the time to go through all the attached links embedded in my initial post [here] but that might take you an hour or two of your time, which incidentally, is less than the time I spent putting-it together.





Germany, in the 1920`s was a leading industrial nation with highly educated and skilled workers. Hyperinflation happened because of excessive government deficit spending and accrued debt.






[BTW, the hyperinflationary period of Germany in the 20`s was not under any German Reich. The 1st Reich was the Holy Roman Empire which lasted from the 10th century until 1806. The Second Reich was the Hohenzollern Empire, which lasted from 1871 to 1918. The Third Reich was Nazi Germany, which lasted from 1933 to 1945. Germany, like the USA was a Republic during the 1920`s.]








Consequently, you must be saying that the German people were just too ignorant to see it coming and that US citizens are far more enlightened and will stop their government from excessive money dilution before a currency crisis occurs. Anything is possible but we are in the third period of the Fiat Money game.



Here is a "1 minute" video putting it all together for you:



http://www.investopedia.com/video/play/monetary-inflation/#axzz2H2AV5Jdh





People on this post might want to know: "What is the greatest risk in real estate investing?"

I believe a temporary credit crunch is it.





Like someone said earlier: `you can hope for the best but plan for the worst`.

Planning for the worst in this case is not that difficult:

Reduce your leverage and go long the term to avoid renewal risk.




All markets are two sided and at the end of the day one has to choose to believe what you want to believe and plan and invest accordingly.
 

Rickson9

0
Registered
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Messages
1,210
Speaking for myself, I'm only active during distressed markets in which I have some small knowledge.



From my limited experience the amount of money that can be made during distressed markets far outweighs anything else.



Another bonus is that to see profits in a distressed market is easier than breathing. To see profits in a non-distressed market actually requires work. Ugh.



Deflation, hyperinflation, stagflation, whatever. Just give me a good price to make it worth my while to get out of bed.
 

Anonymous

0
Registered
Joined
Dec 16, 2008
Messages
1,005
I will go with two major risk that i understood 1) Selection of property 2) Unknown expense



If you take wrong decision of selecting property that mean you lost your all money. And unknown expense will occurs.
 

TangoWhiskey

0
Registered
Joined
Aug 26, 2010
Messages
380
[quote user=ThomasBeyer]Good points .. here are a few more:



Risk 3: area with ex-migration or weak economics leading to property value decline

Mitigate: research, or access to research (such as provided by REIN) to not invest in cities or parts of cities with declining economics and ex-migration







Or, if you find these conditions prevail, be sure that the going in cash price compensates for these risks. Then you can just treat the investment as a bond that paid say 20 % for the life of the bond when the mortgage gets paid back. And that may be a good investment even in weak economics with ex-migration. The key is to know local markets and be aware of the value drops that may happen and lower your price!
 

Thomas Beyer

0
REIN Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2007
Messages
13,881
[quote user=TangoWhiskey][quote user=ThomasBeyer]Good points .. here are a few more:



Risk 3: area with ex-migration or weak economics leading to property value decline

Mitigate: research, or access to research (such as provided by REIN) to not invest in cities or parts of cities with declining economics and ex-migration







Or, if you find these conditions prevail, be sure that the going in cash price compensates for these risks. Then you can just treat the investment as a bond that paid say 20 % for the life of the bond when the mortgage gets paid back. And that may be a good investment even in weak economics with ex-migration. The key is to know local markets and be aware of the value drops that may happen and lower your price!


With falling prices also comes higher vacancies i.e. an inability to hold. Buying into a falling market is not a sound investment strategy, unless you know when the bottom occurs.



Prices can go to zero in some instances.



One such town, for example, is Trail, BC: once a thriving mining town with declining mining activities and poor local economies. I know of at least two people there wishing to sell their homes, one for 4+ years, with no takers. Investing in those towns is very risky.
 
Top Bottom