[quote user=Kewal]The more info you provide all the better.
I think Thomas is saying that, before anyone can give you comment on what would be fair, you need to provide more information.
Two examples:
1) A house has no carpet, and the paint is peeling. It's listed for 450k, but after 15k of renovations in 2 months, you're sure you could sell it for 700k. If you don't have much capital, almost any set of VTB terms would be good here. (100% financing at 15% interest, sold!). The rate doesn't matter, since you'd only be planning on keeping it for a few months, and need your cash resources to renovate.
2) A duplex/fourplex you plan to hold as a long-term investment property. You've determined based on your parameters (net income, etc) that the property fits with your plan at a price of 430,000 with conventional financing. The vendor has said that 450k is firm. Maybe if the Vendor offered you an attractive vendor takeback, that would swing the deal. (80% financing at 3% interest only payments for 5 years, or whatever else you can negotiate). The interest savings are around 18,000 compared with conventional rates, so you'd be getting your price, more or less, while the vendor can still tell his buddies that he sold for 450,000.
So can anyone say that 15% is fair? Maybe, it depends. How about 3%? Again, maybe, but it depends on the situation. If you provide no information, the best you can hope for is random hypotheticals. (Which I've attempted to provide above.)
Regards,
Michael