- Joined
- Jan 29, 2008
- Messages
- 1,025
It seems to me that there are two choices for property management billing systems.
1) Fee for service
Pros: You only pay for what you need
Cons: May get nickle and dimed, expenses will vary, and usually they'll be higher at the worst times. For example when there is an eviction, then repairs, then a re-leasing.
A really good property manager may not like this. After all, if they get great long term tenants set up, and do a great job, there'll be less fees for them.
2) Percentage of Gross, All Inclusive
Pros: Cost certaintly, all-incluse
Cons: If you have a bad PM, they might not be willing to put much time into your property if there are problems.
Of course there can also be a mix, where there is a monthly fee for recurring services and then an additional fee for bigger one-time stuff.
I'd be interested in hearing how others compensate their PM, and which is the most common system.
Michael
1) Fee for service
Pros: You only pay for what you need
Cons: May get nickle and dimed, expenses will vary, and usually they'll be higher at the worst times. For example when there is an eviction, then repairs, then a re-leasing.
A really good property manager may not like this. After all, if they get great long term tenants set up, and do a great job, there'll be less fees for them.
2) Percentage of Gross, All Inclusive
Pros: Cost certaintly, all-incluse
Cons: If you have a bad PM, they might not be willing to put much time into your property if there are problems.
Of course there can also be a mix, where there is a monthly fee for recurring services and then an additional fee for bigger one-time stuff.
I'd be interested in hearing how others compensate their PM, and which is the most common system.
Michael