I have joined the forum and I`m very excited to see all the information that we can share together. I just read Don`s book called, "Real Estate Investing in Canada", where I was introduced to the 10% rule (whereby I should consider property that I can expect to earn 10% in rent for the purchase price of a property (ie: $1000/month in rent for a property valued at $120,000). I read that REIN places Surrey and Maple Ridge the #1 and #2 respectively for real estate investment markets in th Lower Mainland of BC. I`m confused about the 10% rule as it applies to Surrey and Maple Ridge. I`ve been looking into the markets and using the $120,000 property valuation as an example, in both Surrey and Maple Ridge ( according to the MLS.ca website), properties at this level in these areas are unlikely to meet the 10% rule. I say this because when I refer to other sources (ie: craigslist) rents are much lower and the Maple Ridge city website stats average rental rates are also below this 10% rule. So, am I being negative or limited in my thinking assuming the 10% rule doesn`t apply? I want to understand how this does apply....I have a positive approach overall but the facts I`m coming across challenge my thinking. On the other hand, I can see getting 10% on the mortgaged amount of a property but that isn`t the rule, is it?
I do look forward to gaining some insight from people who respond to this post.
I do look forward to gaining some insight from people who respond to this post.