- Joined
- Dec 5, 2007
- Messages
- 2,880
The agreement of purchase the seller and I signed clearly shows all stoves and fridges in this multiplex are included chattels meaning belong to the owner.
However, now that I own the property (closed a month ago) the tenants insist stoves and fridges belong to them. This contradicts some of the tenant acknowledgements I received prior to closing, others unfortunately did not specify that in the acknowledgement provided by the seller. I guess I could have tried harder to investigate the discrepancies prior to closing. However, don`t I have a case regardless of what is mentioned in the tenant acknowledgements since the purchasing agreement shows they are seller owned? Whose responsibility is it to resolve the issue now that I own the property? what are my options if the seller said the truth and the tenants are the less honest here?
would you contact either your lawyer, RE agent or the seller directly to investigate further or would you not even bother? I mean the tenants will not change their "mind". and I can`t even imagine the seller paying me for the "error" not mentioning I don`t really suspect the seller in this case.
Thanks,
Neil
However, now that I own the property (closed a month ago) the tenants insist stoves and fridges belong to them. This contradicts some of the tenant acknowledgements I received prior to closing, others unfortunately did not specify that in the acknowledgement provided by the seller. I guess I could have tried harder to investigate the discrepancies prior to closing. However, don`t I have a case regardless of what is mentioned in the tenant acknowledgements since the purchasing agreement shows they are seller owned? Whose responsibility is it to resolve the issue now that I own the property? what are my options if the seller said the truth and the tenants are the less honest here?
would you contact either your lawyer, RE agent or the seller directly to investigate further or would you not even bother? I mean the tenants will not change their "mind". and I can`t even imagine the seller paying me for the "error" not mentioning I don`t really suspect the seller in this case.
Thanks,
Neil