QUOTE (Dan_Eisenhauer @ Feb 3 2009, 12:59 PM) The one concern I have about using numbers like 7% per year is that the property has to appraise for that figure or greater at the time of sale to the tenant-buyer. If appreciation averages, say 3% over the next 3 years, then the value is going to be off by 12%. How can the tenant-buyer finance that deal then?
And what happens if values drop 10%? Then the sale price is off by a huge amount. Mark has given me one possible way to get around that.
What method is this? a second mortgage?
This wrinkle is why we`ve stopped doing RTOs altogether - the "assumed" future appreciation rate doesn`t matter at all, because the tenant will only be able to get approved for what the property appraises for. In fact, the landlord/seller can only LOSE under such a scenario as the tenant will never be able to close for the higher price!
We only have one RTO in place right now... and in that one the the tenant has agreed that we need to make a miniumum of $50k on the property and the lease agreement doesn`t end until the property can be appraised for such a price.