- Joined
- Dec 5, 2007
- Messages
- 2,880
Hello Everyone,
Based on feedback I get from a few investors, real estate investors prefer NOT to purchase very old properties.
Don Campbell`s GREAT system is teaching us to focus on positive cash flow in addition to appreciation.
Therefore, why are experienced investors not even considering MUCH older properties (even 100 years old) although they can potentially generate MUCH higher cash flow?
For many very old properties, especially duplexes and triplexes, rent to purchase price ratio is 15%(!), CAP rate 8%(!)
I understand the risk and potential "headaches" due to high maintenance costs. However, a detailed inspection done by a certified home inspector (recommended anyway) is supposed to mitigate that risk. Is it not possible that some very old properties are actually in a good condition?
THANKS,
Neil
Based on feedback I get from a few investors, real estate investors prefer NOT to purchase very old properties.
Don Campbell`s GREAT system is teaching us to focus on positive cash flow in addition to appreciation.
Therefore, why are experienced investors not even considering MUCH older properties (even 100 years old) although they can potentially generate MUCH higher cash flow?
For many very old properties, especially duplexes and triplexes, rent to purchase price ratio is 15%(!), CAP rate 8%(!)
I understand the risk and potential "headaches" due to high maintenance costs. However, a detailed inspection done by a certified home inspector (recommended anyway) is supposed to mitigate that risk. Is it not possible that some very old properties are actually in a good condition?
THANKS,
Neil