Non refundable pet fee
- Thread starter leedahlg
- Start date
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2010
- Messages
- 1,578
There was a recent star pheonix article on "pet rent" "pet fees" etc. few months back. Can google it if you like
Can be written up however you wish but fees are not returned to the tenant here. Deposits MAY be (depending on condition and what the deposit was for)
Can be written up however you wish but fees are not returned to the tenant here. Deposits MAY be (depending on condition and what the deposit was for)
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2007
- Messages
- 2,798
Whose realtor wrote that? In the listing or in a purchase contract?
If the buyer's realtor wrote it in the contract, you don't have to accept the term. If your realtor is writing it, you should have a chat with him about it.
If the buyer's realtor wrote it in the contract, you don't have to accept the term. If your realtor is writing it, you should have a chat with him about it.
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2009
- Messages
- 26
You may have misunderstood what I was asking.
The situation that we are in is that we are in the process of selling , and the pet fee tha
The situation that we are in is that we are in the process of selling , and the pet fee tha
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2007
- Messages
- 2,798
Good. Perhaps your realtor doesn't understand the point of a non-refundable pet fee.
The point is the pet may cause extra wear and tear to the property, which reduces the visual appeal and value of the property, but - of course - isn't chargeable when the tenant leaves (or when you sell the property). The pet fee is your compensation for the non-chargeable repairs you must do for extra wear and tear and/or the slightly reduced rent or sale price resulting from wear and tear.
The point is the pet may cause extra wear and tear to the property, which reduces the visual appeal and value of the property, but - of course - isn't chargeable when the tenant leaves (or when you sell the property). The pet fee is your compensation for the non-chargeable repairs you must do for extra wear and tear and/or the slightly reduced rent or sale price resulting from wear and tear.
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2013
- Messages
- 980
^ Sherilynn, that is the argument I would make as the seller of the property. I may argue that the pet fee is part of the administration costs of screening the animal and is fully earned upon move in.
If I were the buyer of the property, I would say that the non-refundable pet fee is really collected because "the pet may cause extra wear and tear to the property" which is really a current liability which is offset by the non-refundable deposit. While the damage is accumulated and unremediated during the tenancy, it is never actually resolved until the tenant moves out. Although the deposit is non-refundable, it is still unearned. The whole purpose of the deposit is to offset the cost of remediating the potential damage, which is not actually repaired until move out. In effect, the pet deposit is a prepaid asset account that offsets a current liability being pet damage.
Both sides have merit
I couldn't find a good court case to point you to but it's just negotiation anyway, not a court argument.
If I were the buyer of the property, I would say that the non-refundable pet fee is really collected because "the pet may cause extra wear and tear to the property" which is really a current liability which is offset by the non-refundable deposit. While the damage is accumulated and unremediated during the tenancy, it is never actually resolved until the tenant moves out. Although the deposit is non-refundable, it is still unearned. The whole purpose of the deposit is to offset the cost of remediating the potential damage, which is not actually repaired until move out. In effect, the pet deposit is a prepaid asset account that offsets a current liability being pet damage.
Both sides have merit
I couldn't find a good court case to point you to but it's just negotiation anyway, not a court argument.
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2007
- Messages
- 2,798
While I see your point, Matt, I think it would be difficult for a buyer to argue there was no extra wear and tear already incurred, potentially causing a slightly lower sale price and therefore warranting the seller keeping the fee.
It is the buyer's choice whether he buys the property in its current condition and with the current tenants (and their pets). The buyer shouldn't receive compensation for that choice.
It is the buyer's choice whether he buys the property in its current condition and with the current tenants (and their pets). The buyer shouldn't receive compensation for that choice.